
Chin Tseng
Computer Science PhD
Final-year PhD student in Computer Science, specializing in data visualization and human-computer interaction. Currently on the job market seeking opportunities in industry.
Try out CatPAL, a palette automation tool I built — feedback welcome!
About Me
I'm Chin Tseng, a final-year Ph.D. researcher in Computer Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, advised by Prof. Danielle Szafir. My research lies at the intersection of human–computer interaction (HCI), human perception, and information visualization, studying how people interpret and reason about complex information through interactive interfaces. Through large-scale empirical studies, I investigate how perceptual and cognitive mechanisms shape user performance, and how widely used design heuristics hold up under realistic complexity. Specific threads include how color, shape, and redundant encodings support analysis of categorical data — and how those findings translate into design tools and recommendations practitioners can act on. Beyond controlled experiments, I work across the full HCI research lifecycle — designing user studies, running mixed-methods research at scale, conducting analyses that surface actionable insights, and translating those findings into recommendations, design tools, and interactive systems. I've shipped data-driven design tools that help practitioners make informed encoding decisions, and built interactive components for real-world analytics workflows. More broadly, I am motivated by HCI questions around how interfaces can better align with human perception, cognition, and decision-making. My goal is to contribute empirically grounded methods and systems that bridge theory, design, and practice in human-centered computing. Looking forward, my research extends to human-centered interface design for AI systems, focusing on how interaction and visualization can help people interpret, verify, and reason with model-generated outputs. Before my Ph.D., I earned my M.S. in Computer Science from NYU and my B.S. from National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan, with an exchange year at TU Dresden. I also enjoy building interactive systems and tools in practice, having worked as a research intern at Epsilon and as a software engineer in industry. A few things that show up in everything I do: I love building, I'm curious about why people behave the way they do, and I find real joy in digging into mechanisms — what causes what, what predicts what. My favorite part of the work is the back-and-forth between empirical rigor and creative tool-building, and getting them to feed each other.
Research Interests
Recent Publications
View AllRedundant Is Not Redundant: Automating Efficient Categorical Palettes Design Unifying Color & Shape Encodings with CatPAW
Chin Tseng, Arran Zeyu Wang, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Danielle Albers Szafir
🏆 Best Paper Honorable Mention
This paper systematically evaluates redundant color–shape encodings in multi-class scatterplots and shows that redundancy is not universally beneficial. Instead, its effectiveness depends on category count and specific color–shape pairings, with the strongest benefits appearing at moderate category numbers. We operationalize these findings in CatPAW, an interactive tool that generates empirically optimized categorical palettes under user-defined constraints.
Uncovering How Scatterplot Features Skew Visual Class Separation
Chin Tseng*, S. Sandra Bae*, Takanori Fujiwara*, Danielle Albers Szafir (*equally contributed)
This work investigates how data and scatterplot features influence people’s perception of visual class separation. By analyzing human judgments across thousands of real-world scatterplots and dozens of quantitative features, we identify which factors most strongly affect perceived separability. The paper also introduces a composite feature model that better aligns with human perception than existing visual class separation metrics.
Graphical Perception of Icon Arrays versus Bar Charts for Value Comparisons in Health Risk Communication
Jade Kandel*, Jiayi Liu*, Arran Zeyu Wang, Chin Tseng, Danielle Szafir (*equally contributed)
This paper compares icon arrays and bar charts for supporting value comparison and decision-making in health risk communication. Through two controlled experiments, we reveal trade-offs between estimation accuracy and decision outcomes, as well as differences across literacy levels. The results yield empirically grounded design recommendations for more effective and equitable risk communication.